From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Nov  8 13:26:36 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp03.primenet.com (smtp03.primenet.com [206.165.6.133])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7A12A37B479; Wed,  8 Nov 2000 13:26:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by smtp03.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA24551;
	Wed, 8 Nov 2000 14:24:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from usr08.primenet.com(206.165.6.208)
 via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAWMaa2V; Wed Nov  8 14:24:21 2000
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA27348;
	Wed, 8 Nov 2000 14:26:12 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <200011082126.OAA27348@usr08.primenet.com>
Subject: Re: unwanteed halt & powerdown under -current (linuxerator?)
To: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG (Mike Smith)
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 21:25:03 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Michael.Reifenberger.gp@icn.siemens.de (Reifenberger Michael),
	current@FreeBSD.ORG ('current@freebsd.org')
In-Reply-To: <200011031156.eA3BuhF04069@mass.osd.bsdi.com> from "Mike Smith" at Nov 03, 2000 03:56:43 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > Not really. See my previous mail.
> > It seems that a SYSV4 Syscall maps to the evil call.
> 
> Unless you had the SVR4 module loaded, it would still have been run as a 
> FreeBSD binary, which would give you exactly the same behaviour.

Is it possible to refuse to run the binary, unless it is FreeBSD
branded?  It would seem that FreeBSD branding should be there,
and that a non-matching branding should be result in a failure.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message