From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Sep 14 7:13:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from eagle.phc.igs.net (ttyA0b.phc.igs.net [216.58.103.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83714151BE for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:12:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eagle@phc.igs.net) Received: from localhost (eagle@localhost) by eagle.phc.igs.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04899; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 00:35:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from eagle@phc.igs.net) X-Authentication-Warning: eagle.phc.igs.net: eagle owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 00:35:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Garrett To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: Greg Lehey , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Brett or no Brett? (was: Catching up) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org as crazy as it may seem, i think brett may have actually accomplished somthing for freebsd advocacy by drawing some people closer together, in order to tell him he's a raving mad lunatic. Who's sole goal in life, seems to be to irritate jkh. Rob On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, Jason C. Wells wrote: > On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, Greg Lehey wrote: > > >Should we have a vote? How many people would like to have Brett on > >the list (as a contributor), how many would prefer him to go away (or > >at least shut up)? I don't think he's done anything to merit being > >forcibly removed, but maybe a vote will help him get the message. > > Brett, at least shut up. > > Thank You, | http://students.washington.edu/jcwells > Jason Wells | "Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither > | freedom nor security." - Benjamin Franklin > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message