From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jun 19 16:23:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nisser.com (c1870039.telekabel.chello.nl [212.187.0.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4607E37B8E5; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 16:22:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roelof@nisser.com) Received: from nisser.com (roelof [10.0.0.2]) by nisser.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id BAA14528; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 01:22:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@nisser.com) Message-ID: <394EAB79.AD4C8BB7@nisser.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 01:23:37 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga Organization: eboa - engineering buro Office Automation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Szilveszter Adam , stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0 CD, crypto and SSH References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > > ... > Perhaps it should say "its RSA implementation" rather than leaving the > posessiveness implied. I'll revisit it.. Won't bother filling out a PR then. On the same topic I also filed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19387 for the same reason. That an RSA lib is needed is made abundantly clear, so that port can and will be found. Thus why not add a simple line saying where 'the other one' is? Roelof -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eboa (ingenieursburo Office Automation) web. http://eboa.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message