From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 24 15:40:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF6016A47C; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820CC43D66; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [172.21.130.86] (mx-broadway [38.98.68.18]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9OFemlI015278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:40:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Andrey Chernov Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:40:43 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200609202304.25537@aldan> <200610240749.11234@aldan> <20061024153523.GA73555@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20061024153523.GA73555@nagual.pp.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610241140.43389.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2091/Tue Oct 24 09:27:53 2006 on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:11:04 +0000 Cc: current@freebsd.org, tjr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacing FreeBSD's -lgnuregex with GNUlib's version X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:40:51 -0000 в╕второк 24 жовтень 2006 11:35, Andrey Chernov написав: > The common bottle neck is locale: > collating, multibyte and character classes handling. Is the currently used -lgnuregex passing these requirements? > I can test it excepting multibyte, our multibyte-enabled developers > needed. > What must be tested before as primary target: general POSIX compatibility. > What must be tested in second: GNU regex compatibility. The proposed replacement is simply the newer version of the currently used Red Hat -lgnuregex. I'd hate to go through the pain similar to that of the csh vs. tcsh debate... -mi