From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 7 18:53:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB14106566B for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcomuskus@une.net.co) Received: from une-avas-out02.une.net.co (mail.une.net.co [200.13.249.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F958FC1D for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (une-avas-out02.une.net.co [127.0.0.1]) by myhostname.mydomain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B5D1C063D; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:53:22 -0500 (COT) Received: from unevm-pmta16.une.net.co (mail.une.net.co [200.13.249.118]) by une-avas-out02.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA98F1C0A37; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:53:20 -0500 (COT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by unevm-pmta16.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453E75200B6; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:53:16 -0500 (COT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unevm-pmta16.une.net.co Received: from unevm-pmta16.une.net.co ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (unevm-pmta16.une.net.co [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m25Lc-t3xh0t; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:53:15 -0500 (COT) Received: from [172.16.1.2] (unknown [190.251.239.160]) by unevm-pmta16.une.net.co (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8C1475200C5; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 13:53:15 -0500 (COT) Message-ID: <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co> Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:53:18 -0500 From: Marco Muskus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> In-Reply-To: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:53:24 -0000 El 05/08/12 20:05, Anonymous Remailer (austria) escribió: >>>> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS > This is not up for discussion. > >> but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. > Too many iPads, iPhones, etc? > >> For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk > If not spelling, or grammar... > >> and speed will gonna be the differentiator. > A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's > not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed. > EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go. English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. > > -- > Speed "Will" Gonna > Be The Differentiator > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >