From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 13 20:20:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09F216A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:20:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crumpet.united-ware.com (ddsl-66-42-172-210.fuse.net [66.42.172.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC6143D4C for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:20:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (adsl-68-252-59-28.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.252.59.28]) (authenticated bits=0)j2DJorlu073316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:50:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:24:08 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <1107178792.613.22.camel@spirit> <200503131051.40700.freebsd-hackers@evilcode.net> <42348525.8080302@cis.strath.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <42348525.8080302@cis.strath.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1486163.gezmYYZZT0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503131524.16075.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on crumpet.united-ware.com cc: Denis Shaposhnikov cc: security@revolutionsp.com cc: "Samuel J. Greear" cc: Frank Knobbe cc: Chris Hodgins Subject: Re: Idea about 'skeleton jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:20:43 -0000 --nextPart1486163.gezmYYZZT0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 13 March 2005 01:23 pm, Chris Hodgins wrote: > Samuel J. Greear wrote: > > Not a bad 'idea' at all, although I won't comment on semantics.=20 > > I had something implemented using fs stacking (in a very hackish > > way, and I believe it's lost now, so don't ask to see it...) to > > implement per-jail quota's that seemed to work quite well. > > > > Sam > > Feel free to comment on the semantics. As I said before, I am not > very knowledgable about filesystems and any insight or alternative > implementation you can provide would be interesting I'm sure to > everyone. > Yeah, if there was jailfs that was setup automatically for the jails=20 that supported quotas out of the box that would kill my major gripe=20 about setting up jails. =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1486163.gezmYYZZT0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCNKFwxqA5ziudZT0RAonEAJ0eykBFRqCIFSjwjbV7yokVTQ6TwgCgw7N+ ZA5Cge8SNspgGcb4fErKnQo= =CbsS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1486163.gezmYYZZT0--