From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 4 17:13:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA04152 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 17:13:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA04147 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 17:13:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id RAA26548; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 17:12:27 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199701050112.RAA26548@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Charles Henrich cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith), joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MMAP Troubles (Joerg?) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Jan 1997 14:54:17 EST." <199701041954.OAA05981@crh.cl.msu.edu> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 17:12:27 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> Slightly older news (but I suspect still current) was that INN is >> faster on FreeBSD _without_ mmap, due to caching etc. Remember that > >I dont see how that is, since the READ/WRITE's just turn into MMAP's inside the >kernel (from what I understand of it). Pages that are read in using read have lower priority than mmaped pages and can be more easily reclaimed. ...so it would probably be faster to do read/write for articles, but slower to do read/write for the active file (which you want to stay in memory if possible). -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project