From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 26 9:23:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0385B37B698 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:22:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 51381 invoked by uid 100); 26 Jan 2001 17:22:48 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14961.45672.151747.176748@guru.mired.org> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:22:48 -0600 (CST) To: "Mike Thompson" Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [Re: FreeBSD-VS-Linux---Some Venting from Linux's side!] In-Reply-To: <74926593@toto.iv> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Thompson types: > I used to appreciate Linux's efforts, as Linux was able to do what no > other *nix could do, and that is to have mass appeal. Somehow Linux > acquired this sexy, yet underdogish aura. Now, with public appeal comes > two things, 1. resources (money, programmers, etc) and 2. the > requirement of giving the public what it wants. Now the former is > wonderful. The latter, however is what bugged me. Perhaps I am in the > minority of liking my servers lean. Which was something Linux initially > had going for it, but now... cool new features seem to have taken the > front seat over performance, stability, and most obviously security. Why > do they keep adding extra bells and whistles? Because you go down to > your local software store, and you've got what? ~15 flavors of Linux?! You know, I agree with you. That's why I distinguish between Linux (the kernel) and "Linux distributions", which are the things you are talking about. The Linux kernel is pretty much ok. It's not perfect, but they are working on it - just like the FreeBSD kernel. The distributions, on the other hand, cover a very wide spectrum. They range from things that are every bit as obnoxious as Windows, to things that are clean and reasonable. Having a wide choice of distributions is a Good Thing. > (there are two OSes in this world Windows and other.) I think the two are actually Windows and Macs. http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message