From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Jul  6 16:28:31 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9A1F614CFF; Tue,  6 Jul 1999 16:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kmarx@bigshed.com)
Received: from bigshed.com (pri-180-dev.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.180])
	by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0DA7097E01; Tue,  6 Jul 1999 16:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <378291C8.107425BF@bigshed.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 16:31:20 -0700
From: Ken Marx <kmarx@bigshed.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: erich@FreeBSD.org
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: FreeBSD Port: linux_lib-2.6.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi,

I already asked the 'questions' alias about this, but I'm really stuck
and thought you might know.

Can you explain what's up with linux_{lib,devel} wrt pthreads?

Is it supported?

If I use libc.so < libc.so.6, ld complains that libpthreads.so.0 needs
libc.so.6; If I use libc.so.6, I get segv's somewhere near a call to
getpid() in the loader (according to ktrace/linux_kdump).

Seems like lib_r might help if I could compile it under linux_devel?
Even then, seems like some stuff might go missing. E.g., IO_putc et al.

Even tried putting in the POSIX P1003.1B stuff into the kernel, but
no effect.

Any clues?

Thanks very much!
k.
-- 
Ken Marx, kmarx@bigshed.com
I'm not sure I understand the problem. Why don't we simply guard the keys to 
the kingdom and manage the care and feeding of the executive summary.
		- http://cgi.bigshed.com/~kmarx/cgi-bin/speak.cgi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message