From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Apr 2 16:42:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA11030 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 16:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (firewall-user@tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp [202.232.14.98]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA11025 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 16:42:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp; id JAA29881; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 09:42:27 +0900 (JST) Received: from unknown(192.168.144.2) by tohokugw.tohoku.iij.ad.jp via smap (V3.1) id xma029873; Thu, 3 Apr 97 09:42:25 +0900 Received: from hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA24833; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 09:42:18 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199704030042.JAA24833@hirose.tohoku.iij.ad.jp> X-MH-BIFF: Version: mh-biff.el version 0.95 on Emacs 19.34.2, Mule 2.3 To: jimd@dutton4.it.siu.edu Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, burgess@cynjut.neonramp.com Subject: Re: Tcl7.6 Scripts? From: Taguchi Takeshi In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Apr 1997 14:26:11 -0600 (CST)" References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.64 on Emacs 19.34.2 / Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 03 Apr 1997 09:42:16 +0900 Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > You may wish to include some extra comments in your README file(s) about the > possible differences in BSD-PORT-MK associated with different versions of > FreeBSD, to alleviate other problems like I have had. I would also suggest > that you report these differences to FreeBSD.org, if the problems are solely > because of the BSD-PORT.MK (note the UID/GID below is not dependent upon the > make files). No! It does *NOT* seem cool at all ;-) Should almost ports REAME include such comments? I never think so.