From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 24 13:41:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3EE106568B; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xen@komadev.de) Received: from zim.freshx.de (zim.freshx.de [83.137.99.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB9A8FC17; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zim.freshx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660738C0151; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:23:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zim.freshx.de Received: from zim.freshx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zim.freshx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTWp0ePp-dly; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zim.freshx.de (zim.freshx.de [192.168.92.113]) by zim.freshx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E78A8C014D; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:23:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Kai Mosebach To: Adrian Chadd Message-ID: <14889119.2221251120185215.JavaMail.root@zim.freshx.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [129.132.228.140] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.11_GA_2695.RHEL5 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/5.0.11_GA_2695.RHEL5) Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing up the xen port - would funding help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:42:00 -0000 Hi, i guess a lot of us feel the same (mainly sadness) about the progress here = and a lot of us have to feed penguins meanwhile... I personally think, that the virtualization technology in general is one of= the key technologies of tomorrow and therefore it makes me even more sad, = that FreeBSD fell back that much these days (years!). Therefore i ask myself whether this should be a major project in general an= d maybe the best way to push it (along with all the administrative and long= term problem) might be to get support from the FreeBSD Foundation, which su= ccessfully enabled Java for BSD some months ago (another key technology as = i think). Otherwise it is very unprobably (in my eyes) that the little daem= on ever will be playing in the ongoing cloud game and everything behind, wh= ich IS and WOULD BE a shame! Maybe some of the core ppl can raise awareness here? Best Kai ----- "Adrian Chadd" schrieb: > Including me, as a developer. >=20 >=20 >=20 > adrian >=20 > 2009/8/22 Randy Bush : > >> 2) Individual monetary contributions cannot be by default handled > by > >> some proxy person (without much legal footwork); they will need to > go > >> directly from the source to the developer. > > > > a number of us have legal business fronts that could be used in > > pass-through mode. =C2=A0let's not worry about administrivia. > > > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"