From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 4 22:30:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF09D16A4E5 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:30:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04F343D4C for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.142]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id k64MU4kQ050920; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 02:30:24 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FxtP9-0000Aq-NT; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:30:03 +0400 To: Karel Miklav References: <448EE6F0.3040003@siol.net> <36698340@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <44AAD522.7000407@lovetemple.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:30:03 +0400 In-Reply-To: <44AAD522.7000407@lovetemple.net> (Karel Miklav's message of "Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:52:50 +0200") Message-ID: <92054068@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC with GNAT Ada compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:30:39 -0000 On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:52:50 +0200 Karel Miklav wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > For i386: gnat-gcc41 seems to have some issues with pkg-plist file, > > some directories are not empty when deinstalling. > > > > For amd64: gnat-gcc34 has a typo: "elif" should be used instead of > > "elsif" when checking for the alpha ARCH. BTW, gnat-gcc34 is for i386 only. Does checking for other archs at makefile mean that at the near future the port won't be i386 only? > Thank you Boris for your report. It would be nice if you could send > some output lines regarding the first issue, but let me guess; you > got something like: > rmdir: /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd6.1: Directory not empty > rmdir: /usr/local/lib/gcc: Directory not empty > rmdir: /usr/local/libexec/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd6.1: Directory not empty > rmdir: /usr/local/libexec/gcc: Directory not empty Yep. > This is by design. All GCC derivate ports install libraries in similar > paths and some juggling is required to properly remove them. But > everything is kind-of under control :) Check the very last part of Oh, I see. > the makefile, it's copied from the gcc41 port and I thought it is > good enough. Maybe I should send those messages to /dev/null? I'd rather do it as other gcc ports do. ;-) Thanks for the great port! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve