From owner-freebsd-net Thu Feb 10 0: 6: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from vidle.i.cz (vidle.i.cz [193.179.36.138]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919AB43D0 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.i.cz (brana.i.cz [193.179.36.134]) by vidle.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B5130702 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:05:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from woody.i.cz (woody.i.cz [192.168.18.29]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A69C36415 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:05:37 +0100 (CET) Content-Length: 751 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <14497.51456.635308.156936@trooper.velocet.net> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:05:37 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: mm@i.cz From: Martin Machacek To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: L2tp thoughts an implementations. Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 09-Feb-00 David Gilbert wrote: > Now... I started vaguely wondering to myself if we could create a > ng_route node... which would have a routing table similar to the > kernel's. This would give you CISCO-like vlan power --- you'd create > a "vrouter" by attaching certain vlans to a route node. Why would you like to bridge VLANs? If I want some stations to be on the same LAN segment I put them to the same VLAN. If I want them to be on different segments I put them in separate VLANs and route (or if you wish switch on layer three) between corresponding interfaces. I don't see any use for bridging VLANs. In any case I would definitely like to see solid implementation of 802.1q VLANs in FreeBSD. Martin --- [PGP KeyID F3F409C4] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message