From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 6 13:28:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA25993 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 13:28:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from inspace.net (root@nova.ispace.com [207.204.40.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA25986 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 13:28:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gme@inspace.net) Received: from caffeine (caffeine.inspace.net [207.204.40.248]) by inspace.net (8.8.6) (8.8.6) (SPAM Stopper: 3.0b2) with SMTP id QAA05964; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 16:27:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "George M. Ellenburg" To: "Jason Lixfeld" , "Doug White" Cc: Subject: Re: Anti-Spam from www.sendmail.org Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 16:26:52 -0400 Message-ID: <01bcd296$2ea78870$f828cccf@caffeine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id NAA25988 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Try the following: makemap hash /etc/spammers < /etc/spammers then kill and restart sendmail. Hope that helps! -----Original Message----- From: Jason Lixfeld To: Doug White Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Monday, October 06, 1997 4:17 PM Subject: Re: Anti-Spam from www.sendmail.org |Okay, I have added the two patches (domain must resolve, and no non-local |relaying) and am noticing some crazyness.. first off, I'm trying to send |a message through pine, and am getting this error: | | [Mail not sent. Sending error: 451 hash map "spammers": unsafe map file] | |Uhmm.. why?! :) | |On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Doug White wrote: | |> On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Jason Lixfeld wrote: |> |> > Reading up on the anti-spam measures via the rulesets for sendmail.cf, I'm |> > confused as to wether or not these measures apply to servers (local hubs) |> > or relays only or do these measures apply to both?! |> |> They apply to everyone, including local workstations. They certainly |> should be placed on hubs and relays. This keeps spammers from using your |> relays as their relays. |> |> Doug White | University of Oregon |> Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant |> http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major |> |> | |