From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 19 16:28:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFCF1065672 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 16:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1E28FC16 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 16:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 May 2009 11:59:19 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.10.5-GA) with ESMTP id PWS21593; Tue, 19 May 2009 11:58:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 19 May 2009 11:58:58 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18962.55105.97714.631461@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:58:57 -0400 To: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <4A12CD95.6040204@netfence.it> References: <4A12CD95.6040204@netfence.it> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade -R order X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:28:55 -0000 Andrea Venturoli writes: > I have a question about the order in which portupgrade -R handles ports. > > If I issue: > portupgrade -R it-openoffice.org > > it will upgrade openoffice.org, *then* gcc43. > > I would guess openoffice.org requires gcc43 to build, but then, > shouldn't it be handled *before*? > > (This is only an example, it happens with other ports too). 1) I can confirm this is not unique to OpenOffice; it's currently happening to me with bash. 2) Does OpenOffice require gcc-4.3.4? Not according to "pkg_info -r". It might be an indirect dependency, but then one would expect things to still build in the correct order. Robert Huff