From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 03:24:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321A816A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 03:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (mx.tele-kom.ru [213.80.148.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F33943D64 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 03:24:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 31877 invoked by uid 555); 27 Apr 2004 14:24:31 +0400 Received: from shark (213.80.149.186) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1083061470-31854 for cpressey@catseye.mine.nu; Tue, 27 Apr 14:24:30 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1723F248; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:58:42 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 15:58:42 +0400 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Rahul Siddharthan Message-ID: <20040426115842.GA4144@Shark.localdomain> References: <20040425215837.3f4708fe.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> <20040426094335.GA7578@online.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040426094335.GA7578@online.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Chris Pressey cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Beginning C++ in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:24:35 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 05:43:35AM -0400, Rahul Siddharthan probably wrote: > Chris Pressey wrote: > >=20 > > A single Greek word for which there isn't an equivalent English word, > > phrase, sentence, paragraph, essay, book, or library would be enough > > though. >=20 > Which has very little relevance to programming languages. Anything > that can be done in one Turing-complete language can be done in > another Turing-complete language. The trade-off is in development > time ("expressiveness") and running time. >=20 // Turing strikes again:) // Ok. Write this (to be compiled as a shared object) in portable C: #include class A { public: A(); }; A::A() { cout<<"This shared library was loaded!"<