From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 30 10:39:19 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1356E4D
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86EC2A7A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2UAdJux076971
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:39:19 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 198979] [maintainer update] devel/visualparadigm to 12.0 build
 20150401
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:39:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-198979-13-if3SYgDw2g@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-198979-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-198979-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:39:19 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198979

--- Comment #5 from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Bartek Rutkowski from comment #4)

Actually I don't know :). I read the handbook and it wasn't clear to me. I
never include the build in the version so it seemed logical to me to bump
PORTREVISION. It is actually the same version, but the upstream project has the
(bad) habit of re-rolling versions with small differences.

But if this is what it's done with ports that behave this way, I'll change the
patch, no problem. Just let me know.

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.