From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 23:58:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3DC37B401 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF3843F3F for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:58:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B6766B9B; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1DD3AB70; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 23:58:08 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joerg Wunsch Message-ID: <20030610065808.GA97710@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030607124704.GA96317@xor.obsecurity.org> <20030609213603.A60007@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030609223343.GA94350@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030610072300.B60007@uriah.heep.sax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030610072300.B60007@uriah.heep.sax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: avr-libc-2003.05.11 broken on i386 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 06:58:09 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 07:23:00AM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > > > Also, would it seem better to properly depend transfig on gs, or > > > should i rather depend avr-libc on gs because i'm having the apparent > > > problem here? > >=20 > > What does the transfig maintainer say? >=20 > revision 1.34 > date: 2003/06/08 00:30:49; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 > Remove chuckr as maintainer of his ports. He has not committed since > 09/2000 and has been unresponsive to mail about his ports for at least > 2 years. >=20 > Approved by: portmgr >=20 > :-( >=20 > I'm tempted to RUN_DEPENDS transfig on gs then. Fine by me, unless anyone else has an opinion. Kris --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+5YF/Wry0BWjoQKURAi5bAJ4hbEvNml8nCr0BeonOkhFhjtAxfACg19NE /LjWwAxZNLmZBNBHFgwdinM= =a/al -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--