From owner-freebsd-scsi Thu Sep 18 01:46:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA19492 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 01:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trifork.gu.net (trifork.gu.net [194.93.190.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA19482 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 01:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.gu.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by trifork.gu.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id LAA09204; Thu, 18 Sep 1997 11:45:04 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 11:45:04 +0300 (EEST) From: Andrew Stesin Reply-To: stesin@gu.net To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: John-Mark Gurney , Zach Heilig , scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI Advansys controller... In-Reply-To: <199709171928.NAA11169@pluto.plutotech.com> Message-ID: X-NCC-RegID: ua.gu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > I haven't done any side by side benchmarks between the two cards, but the > architecture that the AdvanSys cards use doesn't strike me as really > high performance. Back in 1994 I did have some experience with PCI Advansys SCSI controllers, under SCO UNIX. They were noticeable slower than any of NCR 53c810 and Adaptec 2940. Best regards, Andrew Stesin nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE