From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 19:57:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E45DE1 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 19:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91968E86 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 19:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s2FJv4CF015718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:57:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s2FJv4tA015715; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:57:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:57:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Robert Huff Subject: Re: changes to base system DNS In-Reply-To: <53246E80.7030202@rcn.com> Message-ID: References: <53246E80.7030202@rcn.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:57:04 -0600 (MDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 19:57:06 -0000 On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Robert Huff wrote: > Warren Block writes: > >> From dim memory of a couple of weeks ago... > > Making sure I understand: doing this (or the corrected version) will > bring up > named at the same point in the boot process as using system named in previous > versions? It looks and acts the same, but I can't say definitively that it runs at the same time as before.