From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Oct 27  1: 6:47 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C171F15377; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 01:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id BAA36017;
	Wed, 27 Oct 1999 01:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 01:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <199910270806.BAA36017@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: archie@whistle.com, obrien@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/7117: flex -I option is broken
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: flex -I option is broken

State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed
State-Changed-By: obrien
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 27 01:04:57 PDT 1999
State-Changed-Why: 
Man page clearly states "%option interactive" == -I.  It also states
"%option always-interactive" as a seperate option from just "interactive".
IMHO, the manpage is clear.  Diff's would be gladly accepted if others
feel it isn't.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message