From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  4 14:27:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C21116A420
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Mar 2006 14:27:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mcdouga9@daemon.egr.msu.edu)
Received: from daemon.egr.msu.edu (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FE143D45
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Mar 2006 14:27:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mcdouga9@daemon.egr.msu.edu)
Received: by daemon.egr.msu.edu (Postfix, from userid 21281)
	id 82FCD1CC54; Sat,  4 Mar 2006 09:28:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:28:02 -0500
From: Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu>
To: net@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20060304142802.GA63144@egr.msu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: 
Subject: PR kern/93849 IP checksum broken by pf no-df over bridge
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 14:27:45 -0000

Could someone possibly take a look at this and let me know if it
looks 'broken' or if I might be doing something wrong?  I am in 
a crunch to choose a firewall solution within a few weeks and it
would help me to know if this issue can be solved.  FreeBSD/pf
seemed an appropriate solution so far, especially since it has 
CARP, pfsync, (and altq which im not using (yet?)).

I posted to the pf mailing list over a week ago, and created a 
pr shortly after, no responses yet:
kern/93849 

I tested the same ruleset on a different computer with two fxp 
nics last night, no difference.  I reinstalled it with netbsd,
and once I got pf setup and firewalling over the bridge with the
same ruleset, I had the same problem with no-df breaking traffic.