From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 14:28:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C738616A4BF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B08C443FAF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:28:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aradorlinux@yahoo.es) Received: from 46.red-81-42-133.pooles.rima-tde.net (HELO estel) (aradorlinux@81.42.133.46 with login) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 21:28:33 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 23:28:29 +0200 From: Diego Calleja =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Garc=EDa?= To: Randi Harper Message-Id: <20030903232829.732e37d5.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: References: <20030903224346.4bbbf208.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:28:40 -0000 El Wed, 3 Sep 2003 17:02:04 -0400 Randi Harper esc= ribi=F3: > > Yes. This is called "being realistic". > > >=20 > What exactly is realistic about that? There's nothing wrong with=20 > reinventing the wheel if only works perfectly on one type of car. It=20 > doesn't sound like it was a very good wheel in the first place if=20 > that's the case. Well, it's "being realistic" in the sense "you can't rewrite a entire deskt= op software in two days". Gnome and KDE have been working for _years_ and they= 're very ahead of anything else you can find in the OSS world (GPL or BSD). Nothing stops you writing a different desktop platform; in the same way nobody stops you rewriting gcc. (But guess why nobody is rewriting gcc)