From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Aug  4 15:30:45 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC7937B400
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Aug 2002 15:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDBE43E5E
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Aug 2002 15:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de)
Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@)
	by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp 
	id 17bTtZ-0004oO-04; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:30:41 +0200
Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g74MM8an079850
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:22:08 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from mailnull@localhost.mips.inka.de)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
	by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g74MM7uT079849
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 00:22:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
Subject: Re: ports/41258: converters/recode needs new port revision
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 22:22:07 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <aik9ef$2don$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
References: <200208041821.g74IL7f3090456@freefall.freebsd.org>
Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> 
> Is this fixed?

There is disagreement among the ports committers whether such library
updates should really cause revision bumps in all depending ports.
(There is also the problem of direct dependencies that are only
transitively registered.)

In this case, ade chose not to bump the dependent ports.

Either way, we should do all or none.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message