From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 15:06:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55CE106564A for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57128FC1C for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B081FFC53 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BC42784495; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:06:49 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: hackers@freebsd.org References: <1AE2F4B0675743BAB0C54954FBA787CA@multiplay.co.uk> <4B982E57.2050408@gmx.de> <86vdd3kkxx.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100311143237.GP57205@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:06:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20100311143237.GP57205@bunrab.catwhisker.org> (David Wolfskill's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:32:37 -0800") Message-ID: <86r5nqlwxi.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: To sendmail or to postfix that is the question? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:06:52 -0000 David Wolfskill writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Matthias Andree writes: > > > sendmail's configuration was never a black art unless you needed > > > features beyond what the m4 macro set supported. > > The m4 macro set is a fairly recent development. > I was using it in 1993. ISTR it did not become official until much later? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no