From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Nov 10 23:06:59 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA11723
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:06:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA11683;
          Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:06:53 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA08565;
	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 20:18:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
cc: mike@smith.net.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: build machines (Re: Who built XFree86 with Kerberos?) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:02:46 PST."
             <199811110002.QAA12804@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> 
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 20:18:46 -0800
Message-ID: <8561.910757926@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> However, I would rather not have our package building-ability hinge on
> a known-to-be-flaky subsystem.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but the
> problems with NFS has not been exactly solved, right?

For our purposes, I think it will work fine.  The FreeBSD project
has been making fairly heavy use of NFS ever since we decided to
share our home directories between multiple machines that way.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message