From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Mar 5 3: 5:19 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD5637B401 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 03:05:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from eos.telenet-ops.be (eos.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A165443F93 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 03:05:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from philip@paeps.cx) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A1AF1FF9D for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from fortuna.home.paeps.cx (D5768746.kabel.telenet.be [213.118.135.70]) by eos.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FF11FF5C for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from juno.home.paeps.cx (juno.home.paeps.cx [2001:ab8:2007:0:240:f4ff:fe31:3090]) by fortuna.home.paeps.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660C920A7 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:06:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by juno.home.paeps.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C71CC1191; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:05:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 12:05:14 +0100 From: Philip Paeps To: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GVim + GTK2 (was: Re: an apology...) Message-ID: <20030305110514.GA623@juno.home.paeps.cx> Mail-Followup-To: gnome@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Date-in-Rome: ante diem III Nonas Martias MMDCCLVI ab Urbe Condida X-PGP-Fingerprint: FA74 3C27 91A6 79D5 F6D3 FC53 BF4B D0E6 049D B879 X-Message-Flag: Get a proper mailclient! Mutt: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2003-03-04 19:59:12 (-0500), Mezz bsdforums.org wrote: > > > If I want a vim-gtk2 in the ports tree, then looks like I will have to > > > ask for repo copy editors/vim port. But, I don't know if vim-gtk2 patch > > > will work with it, I haven't test it. I only use VIM version from VIM's > > > CVS. > > > > The big problem, I think, is that CVS may or may not work depending on > > when you're checking out code, which is probably a problem in the ports > > tree :-) > > Sorry for multi-mails... I need to think more before I hit the "send" > button. :-| I know the feeling :-P > Anyway, the real reason why we shouldn't have CVS checkout without have > fetch tarball is that... A lot of people are behind the firewall, so it will > not work very well for them with CVS and will work to fetch the tarballs. Mmm, perhaps someone (I could do it if your ISP doesn't like it) could host CVS snapshots in a simple tarball which are 'known to work' with the GTK2 patch. That way, it could be a 'normal' '-devel'- or '-snapshot'-style port skeleton like so many others in the tree. - Philip -- Philip Paeps Please don't CC me, I am philip@paeps.cx subscribed to the list. BOFH Excuse #416: We're out of slots on the server To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message