From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 19:35:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216EE16A46D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B59313C4B8 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 92786 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 18:49:09 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jun 2007 18:49:09 -0000 Message-ID: <466DA400.6000003@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:35:28 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <200706111459.l5BExvTp020932@repoman.freebsd.org> <466D9BBB.1060601@freebsd.org> <466D9D94.1020908@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <466D9D94.1020908@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Andrew Gallatin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mbuf.h src/sys/net if_ethersubr.c src/sys/dev/mxge mxge_lro.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:35:28 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Andre Oppermann wrote: >> Andrew Gallatin wrote: >>> gallatin 2007-06-11 14:59:56 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD src repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> sys/sys mbuf.h sys/net >>> if_ethersubr.c sys/dev/mxge mxge_lro.c Log: >>> Allow drivers, such as cxgb and mxge, which support LRO to bypass >>> the MTU check in ether_input() on LRO merged frames. >>> Discussed with: kmacy >> Not discussed with: andre >> >> Your change isn't the right way to make this work. LRO is an interface >> capability (that should have the option to disable it) and the test in >> ether_input() should go on that instead. LRO is not an information >> that is needed beyond ether_input() and thus doesn't have to be a mbuf >> flag. >> >> I've indicated that I'm working in this area as well and at least >> dropping an email or a ping IRC would have been nice. I would have >> told you the above right away. My common version of LRO isn't ready >> yet as I'm a bit short on time and I chose to concentrate on TCP it- >> self. We only have to make sure that we don't exclude a common LRO >> implementation due to API/ABI issues for 7.1R. >> > > Drew's commit looks simple and non-obtrusive enough that it can likely > be replaced once your perfected LRO implementation is done and in the > tree. Until that happens, I can't imagine a good reason to block his > and Kip's work. I'm blocking nothing. Read again what I wrote. I complained about a technically wrong approach to solve a particular side problem. In the meantime it got backed out because someone else complained too. -- Andre