From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 11 06:00:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057E316A41C; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 06:00:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@dino.dnsalias.com) Received: from dino.dnsalias.com (S010600e02994cd40.vc.shawcable.net [24.80.250.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A69143D1F; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 06:00:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@dino.dnsalias.com) Received: by dino.dnsalias.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1C0D11F74B; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:59:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17066.32221.665435.20574@localhost.localdomain> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:59:57 -0700 To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey In-Reply-To: <20050611052801.GQ87456@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050608084946.GI41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608095703.GM64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608195837.Q65103@Neo-Vortex.net> <20050608104053.GK41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608233136.GX64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608234559.GS41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050609001004.GB64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050609080446.05c897d0@83.149.160.120> <20050609074439.GT41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <17066.30185.318421.273508@localhost.localdomain> <20050611052801.GQ87456@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 From: stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan) Cc: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen , Gianmarco Giovannelli Subject: Re: Problems with gif tunnels X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 06:00:03 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes: > Certainly that confusion exists. But it doesn't seem to be the > problem here: the original poster (Gianmarco?) stated that he had > tried to set up a tunnel with gif(4), which would mean an IP-IP > tunnel. If you were referring to Gianmarco then as the following exerpts from his message show, he initially used nos-tun(4) rather than gif(4) because he thought gif(4) did GRE ... > They insist to use the ipip tunnel (p:4) and I think I should use > the nos-tun interface ... ... > Now I see I could simply use the gif interface (which I wrongly > suppose did only GRE tunnel :-) to connect to an ipip linux > tunnel. ...