From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 28 06:09:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA03985 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 06:09:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA03980 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 06:09:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: (from billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA25750; Mon, 28 Dec 1998 09:09:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from billf) Message-Id: <199812281409.JAA25750@jade.chc-chimes.com> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 09:09:45 -0500 (EST) From: billf@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The recent fracas involving danes, war axes and wounded develo pers To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com cc: nate@mt.sri.com, mike@smith.net.au, committers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199812280654.WAA52157@rah.star-gate.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On 27 Dec, Amancio Hasty wrote: %% If -core members have carte-blanche , then they should be a process for which %% the users, lets say, mailing list members, are allowed to expell a core %% member. Leaving anything to be 'officially' done by a mailing list is silly. Anyone could create votes as quickly as they could fire off spoofed mail. If you want votes to be larger then the Core body itself, the committers is the next logical step down. Finally, I don't think core members should be removed by anyone but other core members, as far as your argument goes. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message