From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 15 18:21:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A8016A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:21:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B7143D1D for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:21:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/NinthNine) with ESMTP id i5FILY8P054865; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 03:21:34 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 03:21:34 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: Jean-Yves Lefort Message-Id: <20040616032134.4ceb4209.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040615130323.2b2fe391.jylefort@brutele.be> References: <20040613183233.7641f818.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> <20040614163108.32bbbebe.jylefort@brutele.be> <20040614180010.1ee7a79b.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> <20040614190129.05afd037.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> <20040615130323.2b2fe391.jylefort@brutele.be> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9-gtk2-20040229 (GTK+ 2.4.3; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: rpratt1950@earthlink.net cc: adam.mclaurin@gmx.net Subject: Re: sylpheed-gtk2 updated to 0.9.11 today (PROBLEM!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:21:47 -0000 On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:03:23 +0200 Jean-Yves Lefort wrote: > Before running the upgraded Sylpheed, remove the old cache files: > find YOUR_MAILBOX_PATH -name '.sylpheed_*' -rm {} \; > This will "resurrect" your mail. I discussed with sylpheed's author. As the result, he decided to bump cache file version. So may I commit following patch? It is a temporary patch. In next version, this will be no need. By reference: Sylpheed 0.9.11 has same problem, but he said that I'll release new version as possible as fast. So I don't make a patch. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/mail/sylpheed-gtk2/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -r1.12 Makefile --- Makefile 14 Jun 2004 11:36:10 -0000 1.12 +++ Makefile 15 Jun 2004 18:11:38 -0000 @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ PORTNAME= sylpheed-gtk2 PORTVERSION= 0.9.11.20040613 +PORTREVISION= 1 CATEGORIES= mail ipv6 MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTNAME} Index: files/patch-src::defs.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/mail/sylpheed-gtk2/files/patch-src::defs.h,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 patch-src::defs.h --- files/patch-src::defs.h 22 Jan 2004 20:15:51 -0000 1.1 +++ files/patch-src::defs.h 15 Jun 2004 17:57:50 -0000 @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ ---- src/defs.h.orig Sun Sep 7 06:09:06 2003 -+++ src/defs.h Thu Jan 22 20:23:18 2004 -@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ +--- src/defs.h.orig Sun Jun 13 23:42:41 2004 ++++ src/defs.h Wed Jun 16 02:57:31 2004 +@@ -60,11 +60,11 @@ + #define CACHE_FILE ".sylpheed_cache" + #define MARK_FILE ".sylpheed_mark" + /*#warning FIXME_GTK2 */ +-#define CACHE_VERSION 2018 ++#define CACHE_VERSION 2019 #define MARK_VERSION 2 #define DEFAULT_SIGNATURE ".signature" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -