From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Aug 29 09:32:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA12778
          for chat-outgoing; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA12770
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sef@localhost) by kithrup.com (8.8.5/8.6.6) id JAA27544; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>
Message-Id: <199708291632.JAA27544@kithrup.com>
To: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Dual Log Stats - 1997/08/29 
References: Your message of "Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:39:37 PDT."
             <199708290739.AAA27357@wcarchive.cdrom.com> 
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Bytes transferred : 200,910,987,981

If I did the math right, that's an average of a bit more than 2MBytes/sec.
average throughput.  (I am assuming this is for a 24 hour period.)

That means it has surprassed a normal ethernet, but has plenty of room for a
fast ethernet.  If it's still connected by 100Mbps connection, it still has
plenty of room.

So what's the thing doing with a wimpy 2000 user limit? :)