From owner-freebsd-security Thu Jul 27 1: 1: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE46037C07D for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 01:00:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA23526; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:00:40 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200007270800.SAA23526@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules) To: pavol_adamec@tempest.sk (Pavol Adamec) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:00:40 +1000 (Australia/NSW) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <397FE9A4.1C1B9215@tempest.sk> from "Pavol Adamec" at Jul 27, 2000 09:49:56 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In some mail from Pavol Adamec, sie said: > > Siobhan Patricia Lynch wrote: > > > ipfilter has to be flushed and reloaded, I don;t have that luxury > > > > ipfw I can add rules on the fly. > > > > Sorry, but ipf can add rules on the fly too. > As for ipf and ipfw - their capabilities are almost equal. [...] IP Filter 4.0 will change that quite dramatically :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message