From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 29 14:26:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF52106566B for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Received: from smtp004.apm-internet.net (smtp004.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F4D48FC16 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Received: (qmail 11143 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2009 14:00:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO titania.njm.me.uk) (81.155.115.96) by smtp004.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 29 Jul 2009 14:00:06 -0000 Received: from titania.njm.me.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by titania.njm.me.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6TDxvS9001649; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:59:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Received: (from njm@localhost) by titania.njm.me.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6TDxuQK001648; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:59:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from njm@njm.me.uk) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:59:56 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" To: Scott Bennett Message-ID: <20090729135956.GA882@titania.njm.me.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Scott Bennett , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <200907291305.n6TD5KST010432@mp.cs.niu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907291305.n6TD5KST010432@mp.cs.niu.edu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: mutt-NJM (2009-07-16) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: this time it's vim/distfiles X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:26:49 -0000 In message <200907291305.n6TD5KST010432@mp.cs.niu.edu>, Scott Bennett (bennett@cs.niu.edu) wrote: > When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the > checksums of 239 (?) patches. (I guess I should take that as a warning.) > Unfortunately, one of them apparently doesn't check out properly. Here's > an excerpt of the portmaster output. > > => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040. > => No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. > => No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. > => No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^. > => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. > . > . > . > => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite. > > ===>>> make failed for editors/vim-lite > ===>>> Aborting update > > ===>>> Update for vim-lite-7.2.209 failed > ===>>> Aborting update > > I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently > had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign. > > DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc > DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3 > DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184 NB: you should be looking in editors/vim since editors/vim-lite is a slave port. The Makefile and distinfo files have different names for the patch - the maintainer appears to have decided to rename the patch file earlier today and only updated Makefile accordingly. The old name was 7.2.041% and the new is to 7.2.041^. Try changing distinfo accordingly. Cheers, Nick. --