From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 23 23:44:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF1816A4B3 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE0E143D7E for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:44:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 37748 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2006 23:44:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1/XmPG7X/P7s+9vBuVtra06JqaEThKXLpK6qWFmzDhy6/RPaZC/yFf2b2XFINRTfAxvWYZNM8BnqkaGIEDG7nKvo1iqRVXmpWMykJu71UfpCbVk7OsG0MuZYi45C8GZhJcmEi0P31azKRh0HzShkcbO5ew29Ts9O7KO1eVkFPrI= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.200?) (mikej@rogers.com@74.111.253.239 with plain) by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2006 23:44:30 -0000 Message-ID: <453D53ED.5050403@rogers.com> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:44:45 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <453D49D2.1010705@rogers.com> <3861E2E8-4232-4C46-8D0A-1B6079BCA07D@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <3861E2E8-4232-4C46-8D0A-1B6079BCA07D@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running large DB's on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:44:35 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Oct 23, 2006, at 4:01 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote: >> So, first of all, am i crazy for choosing fbsd+mysql for this >> rather than something like Solaris + Oracle? :) > > Moderately...it kinda depends on the budget available. I regard > Solaris + Oracle as one of the most reliable combinations for moderate > to extreme load, for a system that might well be in operation for five > to ten years. If I was going to do FreeBSD, I might look into > Postgres instead of MySQL; well, I might look into something else than > MySQL under many circumstances. I've gotten some pretty good use out > of OpenBase, for another choice. > I believe the front-end application is MySQL dependent, but what is so much better about PostgreSQL? I understand that it has some more advanced features, but if they are not used, then what is the advantage? (I really like the InnooDB storage in MySQL) > As for the disk configuration, using RAID-5 is one of the worst > possible choices for a database; using multiple RAID-1 mirrors or a > RAID-10 config would probably do a lot better in terms of performance > and reliability. Is RAID5 really that bad when a lot of fast disks are used and the controller has a decent cache with a BBWC? Thanks for the feedback guys.