From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Mar 18 21: 9:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from fed-ef1.frb.gov (fed.frb.gov [132.200.32.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5D714F77 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 21:09:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org) Received: by fed-ef1.frb.gov; id AAA08155; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:09:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from m1pmdf.frb.gov(192.168.3.38) by fed.frb.gov via smap (4.1) id xma008117; Fri, 19 Mar 99 00:08:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:08:41 -0500 (EST) From: Zippy Subject: Re: Netscape browser In-reply-to: <4.1.19990318215447.03f129e0@localhost> To: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > > I'd rather see some folks (and, yes, I'd help, though I'm not qualified > to do it alone) build FreeBSD emulation for Linux. Then, app vendors could > make a business case for targeting FreeBSD. > > --Brett Tough sell, considering 1) Linux's press of late (the heads of software companies read the trades and WSJ and see Linux all over the place lately, but no mention of FreeBSD), and 2) Jordan's assertion that vendors should port to Linux instead of FreeBSD if they've only got resources for one. Maybe his stance would change if there were a FreeBSD emulator? I think that the prospects of getting native support for applications WITHOUT the vendors first developing for Linux are bleak, at least right now. I'm not sure whether a FreeBSD emulator for Linux would change that. It may be a good idea whose time isn't right. However, if the resources to develop such a beast are available now, why not? SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message