From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 12 07:50:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FCA9DDB for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0522514 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 07:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4C7o0WT092885 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 07:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s4C7o0up092873; Mon, 12 May 2014 07:50:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 07:50:00 GMT Message-Id: <201405120750.s4C7o0up092873@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Hans Fr. Nordhaug" Subject: Re: ports/189457: [MAINTAINER] www/piwik: update to 2.2.2 Reply-To: "Hans Fr. Nordhaug" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 07:50:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/189457; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Hans Fr. Nordhaug" To: Cc: Subject: Re: ports/189457: [MAINTAINER] www/piwik: update to 2.2.2 Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:37:56 +0200 --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline * John Marino [2014-05-10]: > What is going on with this port? > > Version 2.2.1 is unfetchable because of a checksum mismatch. > I just did a makesum on version 2.2.2 and I get a different size than > what is on the patch. > > patch: 8075014 bytes > actual: 8180206 bytes > > Why is this distfile changing size daily? > Or in other words, why is upstream re-rolling this distfile without > changing the filename? > > That practice isn't suitable for ports, can you talk to upstream about this? Hi, John I have complained to the Piwik release manager several times earlier. After 2.2.1 I was so fed up that I filed an issue in the Piwik bug tracker - take a look at the response: http://dev.piwik.org/trac/ticket/5126 And then he went on and repackaged 2.2.2 ... It seems the only solution is to wait a day or two before I update the port (but then some of the Piwik port users start to complain). Anyway, updated distinfo file attached. The rest of the patch is still correct. (The original package contained an empty manifest file.) Regards, Hans --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="distinfo" SHA256 (piwik-2.2.2.tar.gz) = 5485debaa69918ed8d9479559b25a9a59330a45b0a390d11a2fd8b9fbc0257f5 SIZE (piwik-2.2.2.tar.gz) = 8180206 --AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--