From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 28 17: 3:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980A037B404 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:03:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2C63A842; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:03:14 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C2054E3; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:03:14 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:03:14 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew To: "Justin C.Walker" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routing Socket and New Addresses In-Reply-To: <94CFAED8-1360-11D6-B323-00306544D642@mac.com> Message-ID: <20020129105500.X59247-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Justin C.Walker wrote: > It is and it is :-}. At least, Stevens discusses it in "Unix Network > Programming", v1, 2e (sec. 20.3). Different systems, alas, treat this > case differently. My section 20.3 is on UDP Datagram Trunctation...did you mean 17.3 (Routing Sockets: Reading and Writing). I can't find any mention of this behaviour in either place mind you. Thanks, Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message