From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jul 28 6:38:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.mediadesign.nl (md2.mediadesign.nl [212.19.205.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B69937B403 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 06:38:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alson@mediadesign.nl) Received: (qmail 20285 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2001 13:38:22 -0000 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 15:38:22 +0200 From: Alson van der Meulen To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HA-NFS on FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20010728153822.B8675@md2.mediadesign.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <004001c116df$9854d8e0$0e00000a@tomcat> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004001c116df$9854d8e0$0e00000a@tomcat> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 05:03:33PM -0400, Andrew C. Hornback wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of atul n vidwansa > > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 7:07 AM > > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: HA-NFS on FreeBSD? > > > > To, > > Whom so it concerns, > > I want to implement an Highly Available Network File > > Server, but i can not decide which OS to use, FREEBSD or LINUX. > > If anyone can give me suggestion on it,he/she is well come. > > Thanx, > > Atul N. Vidwansa > > You will definately want to use FreeBSD for this, along with the proper > hardware for the task. FreeBSD's standard file system is much more reliable > than the ones available for Linux. And the cornerstone of high availability > is reliability. Do you really expect that people on a FreeBSD list prefer Linux to FreeBSD? You can't really expect a fair comparison between two operating systems on the list of one of the OSes IMHO... BTW: UFS with softupdates is indeed more reliable then ext2 with async mounts, but the reliability of ReiserFS/XFS/JFS on Linux will be quite good too I guess... I'd personally trust the FreeBSD kernel more for stability then the Linux kernel, but there are Linux servers running reliable too... Maybe a topic for freebsd-advocacy? :) -- ,-------------------------------------------. > Name: Alson van der Meulen < > Personal: alson@flutnet.org < > School: alson@gymnasiumleiden.nl < `-------------------------------------------' The sprinkler system isn't supposed to leak is it? --------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message