From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 09:57:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25F01065672 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com (mail-bw0-f216.google.com [209.85.218.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1EC8FC1D for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so12063826bwz.3 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:57:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6/tGyzrjeQfCBUxOF24G302upXKPWoxLovYgPCZ9n6g=; b=dJs6LU9QdRY0b0d+EMpKrAaEKvWKb1x8gkotdRWxx1szopZGF4AH9yKH7t9+njh++E wlZPtjx+yc1/vQLDDf84LcvvqSMrwDckemSjCzuxnhdTiXPO3TwMl6lnF2JqLmbP4qcL lzSLZCo5/UQdDB+a50LMc9AHF3ld9qE8k20d0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e3BFmreIGwJCodmh69zmV0Q/npWq7wfZ/rb8ws/xqg1UJWQtABFJm2evMEPzXLDSmH eFdA+nfft93vtv5Y8zw01FuroeX8LEfe/CS8Znoby2HTodfu8lGxgJ9iX8bcjuiSzV+l uddMw4ga3zjCDQE/D7eKbagjpx46lVuheLZMw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.140.212 with SMTP id j20mr3467637bku.119.1272362224051; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.79.3 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:57:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:57:04 +0400 Message-ID: From: pluknet To: Jeff Roberson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dikshie , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:57:11 -0000 On 27 April 2010 10:01, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote: > >> On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jeff, >>> thanks for SUJ. >>> btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean? >>> -------------- >>> ** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g >>> ** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4. >>> ** Building recovery table. >>> ** Resolving unreferenced inode list. >>> ** Processing journal entries. >>> ** 0 journal records in 0 bytes for nan% utilization <=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> ** Freed 0 inodes (0 dirs) 0 blocks, and 0 frags. >>> -------------- >>> >> >> That may be due to an empty journal (the only plausible version for me), >> so jrecs and jblocks are not updated. > > Yes, this is it exactly. =A0It's a simple bug, I will post a fix in the n= ext > few days. > > Thanks, > Jeff > While here, could you please look at my another su+j issue email? (to not create a new thread of the same thing). Thanks in advance. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2010-April/023303.html --=20 wbr, pluknet