From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 5 10:50:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-www@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B1316A420 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2928443D48 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k15Ao50E094573 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:50:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k15Ao5x7094572; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:50:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:50:05 GMT Message-Id: <200602051050.k15Ao5x7094572@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org From: Daniel Gerzo Cc: Subject: Re[2]: www/92474: [patch] fix for the xsl template X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 10:50:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR www/92474; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Gerzo To: Ceri Davies Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: www/92474: [patch] fix for the xsl template Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:38:33 +0100 Hello Ceri, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 1:20:35 AM, you wrote: > On 28 Jan 2006, at 22:09, Daniel Gerzo wrote: >> As we are not in the middle of RC (and the $beta.testing is set to >> '0'), >> the web pages generated from xsl are still containing URLs for 6.0-RC1 >> because of this wrong "if". > Can you give an example? I've just checked the two pages that use > this code and they look fine. if the xsl template uses this: then you can see the bug, but actually I wasn't able to find any page which uses this currently. I found this bug when I was XML'ifying the release todo list. > Ceri -- Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo