From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 18 22:13:24 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DCE1065672;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:13:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com)
Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541688FC1B;
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:13:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o8IMDNtr026215
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o8IMDNbH026214; 
	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407)
	id AA15753; Sat, 18 Sep 10 15:09:25 PDT
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:09:19 -0700
From: perryh@pluto.rain.com
To: kientzle@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <4c95388f.vSPICvvA6A5bgvDR%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1008281833470.9337@multics.mit.edu>
	<20100829201050.GA60715@stack.nl>
	<alpine.GSO.1.10.1009032036310.9337@multics.mit.edu>
	<F56D9CB9-E644-4279-8830-71292C880D9B@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <F56D9CB9-E644-4279-8830-71292C880D9B@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ar(1) format_decimal failure is fatal?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:13:24 -0000

Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Personally, I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to just always
> force the timestamp, uid, and gid to zero ..

uid and gid, OK.  Timestamp, no.  It is not that rare to need
to find out which version of some .o is in a particular .a file,
usually in connection with debugging some obscure failure.

For that matter, aren't there some versions of make(1) that can
check whether an archive member is up to date by examining the
timestamp in the archive?