From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 19 20:16:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111B510656FC for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 20:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.eu [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C366D8FC0A for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 20:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-6-56.51-151.net24.it [151.51.56.6]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4JKGHx7082137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:16:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n4JKGGmD084903; Tue, 19 May 2009 22:16:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4A131390.2070400@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 22:16:16 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090321) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew W. Nosenko" References: <4A12CD95.6040204@netfence.it> <6161f3180905190911j4c09ce0cnb743ae7fbb59b5fc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6161f3180905190911j4c09ce0cnb743ae7fbb59b5fc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -R order X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:16:30 -0000 Andrew W. Nosenko ha scritto: >> I would guess openoffice.org requires gcc43 to build, but then, shouldn't it >> be handled *before*? > > Whether OOo requires gcc-4.3 indeed? Not "customized" version of > gcc-3.4 (ooo-gcc if I recall correctly...)? No. I'm really talking about lang/gcc43. > About another ports: the was majority of prorts doen't require any > specific GCC version supplied in ports, but use system-default gcc > instead (/usr/bin/gcc), therefore, order of building gcc-4.3 from > ports is irrelevant. Ok, but I guess we have two cases: a) OOO requires gcc43 (either directly or through another dependency): then I guess gcc43 should be build before OOO; b) OOO does not require gcc43 at all: then I see no reason for it to be upgraded. In any case I see no point in building it after OOO. Perhaps I'm missing something? (Again, you can substitute OOO and gcc with other ports in different scenarios). bye & Thanks av.