From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 23 23:20:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE06737B423 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:20:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 22598 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Apr 2001 06:18:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:18:43 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22 Message-ID: <20010424091843.B22159@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <080e01c0cc84$0e693860$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010424090458.A22159@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <083601c0cc86$07e1dae0$931576d8@inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <083601c0cc86$07e1dae0$931576d8@inethouston.net>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:15:57AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I think Maxim Sobolev's suggestion about samba20 and samba was most to the point, although, with the need for a samba-devel port, there get to be three Samba ports.. I don't necessarily think that's a bad thing. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence every third, but it still comprehensible. On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:15:57AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > That's true, but some people expressed concern for those who wanted to stick > with 2.0.8 and just have samba20 and samba22 in the ports. Either way is > fine for me just as long as samba-devel doesn't stay that way forever. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Pentchev" > To: "David W. Chapman Jr." > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:04 AM > Subject: Re: Reminder samba-devel -> samba22 > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 01:01:51AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > Just a reminder to whomever takes care of this to rename samba-devel to > > > samba22 since it isn't alpha anymore. > > > > I don't really know if samba22 is a good name.. Isn't it supposed to > > be just 'samba' now that it is the 'official' branch? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message