From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 16 19:45:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9375E16 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F09EC28 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4GRv-1XG8Ua1ojT-00rlAO; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 20:44:59 +0100 Message-ID: <5325FF45.2080106@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 20:45:09 +0100 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng vs random port moves References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:wSghthkofdb/6x7+VDho/4kTwvpc4mLrOlIJ0X08ib4tpdlRTlX 85tHmGa+ofU+1VmMR/cPCEnsrs8swbzYYquZ1bLW1PblDkQZLfvLzQNNZauJ1RmEqBHf2H7 c2HfCobRQtLu5UumltiTiKTYlCItnJEZABWf1TxJXjZ+s3y/gkRqs1ogjaXFThPGs2hCjVJ kDT2rUdfRztKIvKAZzdPA== Cc: J David X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:45:08 -0000 On 2014-03-16 18:50, J David wrote: > Is there a best practice for what to do with pkgng when ports > maintainers randomly rename ports? (E.g. mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin > being moved to mail/spamassassin a few days ago without notice or > warning or documentation in UPDATING.) > > Prior to pkgng, we used to use pkg_replace for this. portmaster also > has an option for it. But pkgng seems to assume that never happens > which is (unfortunately) not a valid assumption. > > Thanks for any advice! Hi David, run the following command and pkgng will take care of the renamed port. #> pkg set -o mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin:mail/spamassassin The syntax is similar to the one from portmaster pkgng: pkg set -o $old:$new portmaster: portmaster -o $new $old Unluckily for spamassassin there is only an entry in ports/MOVED an no instructions in ports/UPDATING. -- Regards, olli