From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 18:47:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8001537B476 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B443523070; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:16:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id E8C389EFA5; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:11:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:50:23 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Nat Lanza Cc: Joe Kelsey , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc3.x issues Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20020212021146.E8C389EFA5@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:30:22PM -0500, Nat Lanza wrote: > Surely you see the difference between "That's an interesting idea; can > you generate some patches so we can take a look and see how it works > out?" and "WhereTF is your patch to do this?". Yes there is. Earlier on in the thread I would have used your language. But at this point we are deep in a thread in which I've explained the issues and many people don't seem to be listening. Thus you get the language showing my frustration. Sorry I'm only human. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message