From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 26 2:12:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684AE37B422 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 02:12:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f3Q9Cnh20226; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 02:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 02:12:49 -0700 From: "'alfred@freebsd.org'" To: PETIT Sebastien Cc: "'hackers@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Question about Posix Threads Message-ID: <20010426021249.B18676@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from spetit@selectbourse.com on Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 02:44:54PM +0200 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * PETIT Sebastien [010426 01:43] wrote: > Hi, > > Is it the same limitation problem about the performance under mysql with a > lot of IO ? Yes, basically most of the performance problems you're seeing on FreeBSD should be because of the threads libraries, nothing else. You might want to see if you can link mysql against the linuxthreads port to gain more peformance wrt IO. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message