From owner-freebsd-security  Wed Dec  4 17:07:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id RAA27445
          for security-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:07:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA27440
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA12859; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 18:06:37 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 18:06:37 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199612050106.SAA12859@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>,
        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions...
In-Reply-To: <199612050054.QAA02606@salsa.gv.ssi1.com>
References: <nate@mt.sri.com>
	<199612050054.QAA02606@salsa.gv.ssi1.com>
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> } > >I don't think so.  Changes have been committed since 2.1.6, but not
> } > >since it was frozen.
> } > 
> } > WRONG! Look at the ctm updates in the archive. They are triggered by SOME
> } > change in the CVS tree for the 2_1_0 tag.
> } 
> } I didnt' see any that came after.  I think you're confused.
> 
> I just got a ctm update for -stable in the mail today.  It looks like the
> first one since 2.1.6.1, which is only about a week and a half old.

I forgot that Satoshi made a change to bsd.port.mk last night.  Whee...

> } > >2.1.* is dead in my mind, and I suspect many others.  It lived long past
> } > >it's usefulness in the developers mind.
> 
> I'll agree that it's dead as far as new development, but I'll have it
> running here for quite a while yet.  I'd like to see security patches
> released as needed.

How would they be distributed?


Nate