From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 05:34:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8453816A4CE; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8861243FF2; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:34:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hARDYYIc002749; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Message-Id: <20031127.223434.846935079.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: dev@porting.openoffice.org, Pavel@Janik.cz From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: References: <3FC30806.8000502@mailru.com> <20031125.213349.596611807.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: jaroshenko@mailru.com cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [porting-dev] Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:34:25 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:34:25 -0000 Hi, Pavel > > so I can say OOo 1.1 ports are almost ready for 5.2-RELEASE. > > how did you solved http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22253 > > Do you still mkdir soffice.cfg in the ports? Yes we do. this is serious problem, which prohibits to do QA. I recieved some mails about `I want to use OOo just *now*, there are no packages for our langs, so I had tried by myself from ports, but in vain, how can I fix it?' well, there are serious demands for them. 5.2-RELEASE is approaching, ports, src are now frozen, so just what I want to say is: `it works for me, and I'm 99% sure that this port will work for 5.2-RELEASE, so if you want working package for 5-series, please do cvsup ports tree, and upgrade userland kernel or wait for 5.2-RELEASE, it is for you'. --maho