From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 11 05:12:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7385916A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from redix.it (host49-169.pool8172.interbusiness.it [81.72.169.49])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22B5C43D1D
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 05:12:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from roberto@redix.it)
Received: (qmail 21002 invoked by uid 72); 11 Feb 2004 13:12:46 -0000
Received: from 192.168.0.77
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user roberto)
        by mail.redix.it with HTTP;
        Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:12:46 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1171.192.168.0.77.1076505166.squirrel@mail.redix.it>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:12:46 +0100 (CET)
From: roberto@redix.it
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: Question about securelevel
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:12:54 -0000


I want to discuss securelevel and whether it's a good or bad thing.

Now, I do not need help to get it working (but never say never ...).

I'll try to explain my idea.

Suppose I'm trying to setup a packet-filtering firewall based on FreeBSD,
and I want to harden it (I heard about TrustedBSD, but here I want to
speach about securelevel).

I made the assumption that the console (of my BSD) is in a safe place, so
I can exclude any hack from it. It should be the only place where the
administrator can access the O.S. with securelevel disabled (i.e.=0, by
means of a single user mode).

In normal condition, O.S. is running on securelevel=3 so nobody can:
 - kernel module connot be loaded or unloaded;
 - packet filtering rules connot be altered;
 - /dev/mem and kmem cannot be write;
 - immutable and sys flags cannot be turned off;

In addition (this is my idea), suppose to configured the root filesystem
read-only and there is no way to change this (remount it rw) when
securelevel is == 3.

Could this configuration be considered secure, according to you?
There are any weakness of securelevel still present?

Any comments are welcome...

Regards,
Roberto